[vc_row css_animation=”” row_type=”row” use_row_as_full_screen_section=”no” type=”full_width” angled_section=”no” text_align=”left” background_image_as_pattern=”without_pattern”][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
A landscape that is no longer a Neo-Romantic refuge, a superficial caress or a new voyeurism, although exhausted and barely analytic.<\/span><\/p>\n It is not a \u201creactionary\u201d landscape: reactionary is the other face of the avant-garde, but these are hard times and sleepless nights for the avant-garde, whose epochal cycle has come to an end, even though some may attempt an umpteenth pretense, or reduce everything to a persuasiveness, a multitude of colors, a playful glitter, a technological aestheticism without the \u201cessence\u201d of the technical. Perhaps now the \u201csublime\u201d is the impossible and the landscape is \u201cimpossible\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n After the last remnants of nature, the last chance, can I still be so \u201csure\u201d in understanding that I will lose. Can I go \u201cbeyond nature\u201d?<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n The landscape is useful in terms of its owns cancellation. It does not want to relate to society, even though the signals of communication are imposed upon it at times.<\/span><\/p>\n The landscape repudiates indifference and glitter, burdened as it is with its own disappearance. However the landscape is still a place of signs where sense and concept are mediated. It is the absence of a landscape that fills and reveals the landscape, living its drama of loss.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n